This is Tikiwiki v2.2 -Arcturus- © 2002–2008 by the Tiki community Mon 06 of Sept., 2010 04:57 MDT

Menu [toggle]

Print

Responses to the email

Party Policy

PartySpokepersonDate of responseResponse?
ACT New ZealandHeather Roy 18/9/08 response
Aotearoa Legalise Cannabis Party no response
Direct Democracy Party (email bounced)
Jim Anderton's ProgressiveJim Anderton 22/9/08 response
Libertarianz no response
Māori Party no response
New World Order (couldn't find an address)
New Zealand First Party no response
New Zealand Labour PartyPhil Goff 18/9/08 auto response
New Zealand Pacific Party no response
RAM - Residents Action Movement (weren't listed on Election website at the time)
The Alliance no response
The Bill and Ben Party (Couldn't find a (serious) address)
The Family Party no response
The Green Party of Aotearoa/New ZealandMetiria Turei 26/9/08 response
The Kiwi Party no response
The New Zealand Democratic Party for Social Credit JC Ring18/9/08 response
The New Zealand National PartyTim Groser 17/9/08 read receipt
The Republic of New Zealand PartyWayne Hawkins 17/9/08 read receipt
United Future New ZealandPeter Dunne 17/9/08 read receipt
Workers Party of New Zealand no response



ACT Response

Thank you for your enquiry - ACT supports moves to stem the rise of IPR
infringement, and will be watching negotiations with interest.


Regards


Sally Guinness
Executive Assistant to:
HEATHER ROY MP
Deputy Leader, ACT New Zealand


Anderton Response

As a member of the government and leader of the Progressive Party, the Hon
Jim Anderton supports the work currently under way regarding this Anti
Counterfeiting initiative

Tony Simpson
Advisor


Green Response

We appreciate your interest and concern on this topic. It appears that you have taken a great interest in the Anti-Counterfeit? Trade Agreement negotiations http://acta.lemming-brothers.com/tiki-index.php?page=Completed+Submission.

The Green Party’s position on the agreement is limited by the dearth of official information available on the topic. Because much has been negotiated in secret, there is concern that it may be used to prevent the fair use of copyrighted materials, require Internet Service Providers (ISPs) to monitor all consumers’ Internet communications, or undermine access to low-cost generic medicines. In May this year, Cabinet agreed to join the negotiations but failed to let the NZ public know about this. These agreements are negotiated behind closed doors and so we will not know the outcome until the final outcome is brought to the House.

Negotiations on international trade agreements such as this must be done publicly to facilitate healthy debate and prevent unjust laws from being passed. Unfortunately the Green Party has very little influence over matters such as these; there are only six of us and most of our authority exists in more immediate, domestic issues. The Green party constantly raises concerns that the NZ public are shut out from knowing what is being negotiated or what the consequences are for us.

Check out our blog:

http://blog.greens.org.nz/2008/09/18/the-anti-counterfeiting-trade-agreement/ (external link)

Sincerely,

Metiria Turei
Green MP

Democratic Party for Social Credit Response
Speaking as an executive member of CAFCA (since 1992) I personally find the
proposed treaty quite appalling.

The policy of Democrats for Social Credit was created before we were aware
that this proposed treaty existed, so I will have to refer to general principles
that the party holds to.

Firstly, we disagree with international treaties being negotiated in secret.

Secondly, we are in favour of an independant foreign policy.

Thirdly, if any existing treaty is found not to be in New Zealand's interest,
a Democrats for Social Credit government will withdraw from that treaty.

Fourthly, we do have principles that could be loosely summed up as meaning we
would be nice to developing countries.

Those policies do allow for a range of interpretations.

However, it is important to remember that a Social Credit analysis is
different from both Marxist analyses and standard Capitalist analyses in a
number of ways, one of which is that the Social Credit view attaches a high
importance to invention, but accepts that every inventor stands on the shoulders
of previous inventors, and the culture that surrounds them. (It is doubtful
whether metalworkers in Florence in Leonardo da Vinci's day would have been able
to make some of the things he designed. One of the reasons that Britain's
industrial revolution succeeded was that there was a large pool of people in the
midlands who were able to make what somebody else designed.) Thus, every member
of society has some claim to the benefits of what inventors do.

In addition, it must be remembered that back in the 1950s the first leader of
the New Zealand Social Credit Political League (inc.) was a manufacturer of
generic pharmaceuticals. (There used to be a lot of them in New Zealand, but
foreign interests bought them all out and closed them down.)

While the matter has not been put to a party conference, I am totally certain
that the party membership would oppose this thing.



Created by: admin. Last Modification: Saturday 11 of October, 2008 19:35:05 MDT by admin.

Powered by Tikiwiki Powered by PHP Powered by Smarty Powered by ADOdb Made with CSS Powered by RDF